A disciplined discovery framework for translating QAD's operational-event-to-ledger behaviour into D365 posting profiles, built on tenant extracts and transaction replay rather than on documentation that does not exist.
Every other module on this path can tell you what to build. This one mostly tells you what to find out, and that difference is deliberate.
The adapter's posting rules define ten families. Four are recorded as gaps with low or medium confidence; six are recorded as mapped but every one carries a pending client-validation flag.
Before any mapping, build a census. This is the artefact the whole module rests on.
The census tells you what exists. This table tells you what to demand for each family before design starts.
These are one problem, not two, and the problem is the accrual between them. The target models product receipt and vendor invoice as distinct accounting events with a clearing account holding the received-not-invoiced position in between.
D365 splits posting derivation across several constructs, and knowing which one owns which decision prevents a great deal of misdirected design.
The playbook specifies golden scenarios, and they are the correct replay set: purchase receipt and invoice, sales shipment and invoice, production issue, completion and variance, quarantine, scrap and release, intercompany, recall and traceability drill-back, and EDI shipment acknowledgement.
Extracts take time to obtain, and the programme cannot idle. Four activities are productive before they arrive.
The QAD posting engine is not publicly documented, and this module does not pretend otherwise. The translation is a discovery exercise with named deliverables: a configuration extract and a posted-transaction sample per family, an event census that separates real behaviour from configured possibility, and a replay test that compares…